JB wrote, in ink or pencil, into his copy of
the History a great deal of additional information and notes of interest
one way and another, the most important being the results of his
investigations into the later life of Robert Boultbee (see page ) but none of his written comments refer to the early family members mentioned by TPB in the first two chapters of the History.
Among the several loose papers in his copy,
however, was a memorandum dated March 11th, 1896. This shows that JB had
himself done some interesting research with special reference to the
first Boultbee of the History, the first Thomas of Griffydam,
Leicestershire, and his possible forebears in Yorkshire. This memorandum
was certainly not available to Walter Richard Pownall, and it here
follows:-
There is a surmise that our first
Leicestershire Thomas Boultbee of Griffydam is a descendant of the
Boulbys of E. and N.E. Yorkshire. Bearing in mind Mary Kempson's (née
Boultbee) account of the family that they left the North in consequence
of troubles there and altered the name from Boultby to Boultbee, and
came into Leicestershire, and, having realised all their personal
property in the north, bought property in Leicestershire - then one
looks for a Thos. B in Yorkshire whose dates answer and combine with
such dates as we are assured of - the first date that we have affecting
Thos. B is that in 1636 he married Mary Baxter at Breedon Church,
Leicestershire, so he must have been in Leicestershire anterior to that
date, how many years we cannot say. From letters from Miss Sherwood of
Prospect House, Whitby, who is a Boulby in descent and much interested
in the Boulby family, I gather from the abstract of a will she sent me
recently, that there was about that time a Thomas Boulby (a son of
George Boulby) who might answer to our Thomas Boultbee - the copy she
sent is as follows:
In this Will we have the names of Thomas B and his sister Elizabeth B, their father George and their grandfather Edward -- The record would appear thus:-
The dates seem to fit in -- assuming that
Thomas was our Thos -- he leaves Yorkshire anterior to 1636 and works as
a basket maker according to our tradition -- then his father George
dies 1642. Thomas realises his share of the property and purchases
property in Leicestershire (as our Thomas did) surprising his neighbours
in coming out as a monied man of means sufficient to purchase property
there -- before his father's death he had to work at a handicraft.
|
(The twin villages of Lastingham and
Spaunton lie below the southern edge of the North Yorkshire Moors
approximately halfway between Thirsk, and Scarborough on the east coast.
Spaunton had no church. Boltby village is some 5 miles north-east of
Thirsk, and about 16 miles west of Lastingham).
At first sight, the Lastingham group looks
potentially promising. Here we have a Thomas who could have been born
about the right period, a sister Elizabeth, their father who died in
1642, and a grandfather who was still alive in December, 1641.
JB equates this Thomas with the first Thomas
of Griffydam of the History. We have to admit that this is possible,
but if so a move on his part to Leicestershire could not have been
caused by any contemporary troubles in the North, the first half of the
17th century being peaceful, apart from squabbles between Charles I and
his Parliament, until the onset of the Civil War in 1642. There seems no
obvious reason why the Lastingham Thomas, the eldest son, inheriting
leasehold property and goods from his father should want, or need, to
move so far away. Moreover, the Thomas of the History was married at
Breedon-on-the-Hill Church, Leicestershire in 1636. However, as we have
said, and JB surmised, it is possible that they are one and the same
person, Lastingham Thomas having migrated several years before the death
of his father. In his possible persona of the Legendary Basket maker
from the North, at some later time, he surprises his neighbours by
becoming a man of property, perhaps having realised the value of his
inheritance in 1642. This scenario is plausible but its stumbling block
is that it cannot be related to any troublous times in the North.
Against it there are further points. At that
time Thomas and Elizabeth were very common given names, particularly
the latter, and it could be just coincidence that they occur in the
Lastingham family. We think that 1642 is somewhat late for their surname
not to include the letter t, even allowing for the many different
spellings of the name which persisted in church registers and other
records for a long time. Thomas of Griffydam's surname, according to the
record of his marriage was definitely Boultby. It really seems unlikely
that he was Boulby in Yorkshire and Boultby in Leicestershire. Even
phonetic spelling by whoever wrote the entry in the Breedon register
could hardly have made such a mistake.
On balance, with all due respect to a fine
piece of deduction by JB -- acting on the information sent to him by the
Whitby lady descended from Boulbys -- we have to say that we are not
entirely convinced that the family history has been traced back further
to the Boulby family of Lastingham. That family could have been
descended from quite early Boulbys. Reference to page of the History
will confirm that Boulbys, and the variation Bowlby, were in Yorkshire
and nearby Durham. There are ample early Yorkshire instances in Appendix
1 of the name being spelt with a t where there could have been no
phonetic confusion.
JB finds the name Margaret for Thomas of
Griffydam's great-granddaughter significant with a connection to
Lastingham, but we note below another possible reason for the choice of
that name.
We think that another solution to the
problem of who migrated to Leicestershire from the North is one which
merits serious consideration, and which could meet its various aspects.
This was worked out by Walter Richard Pownall in Appendix 1. It seems
simplest to recapitulate its salient points here, adding our editorial
comments.
In 1595, a Robert Boltbye's Will is proved
and in 1603 that of his wife, Elizabeth, her name now being spelt
Boultbye. Both lived in the village whose modern name is Goadby Marwood,
Leicestershire, north-east of Melton Mowbray. Records unknown to TPB,
JB, or Walter Richard Pownall show that in the late 16th and early 17th
centuries there were other Boultbees (we use the later spelling for
convenience) with various spelling differences in their surnames in the
records, living in the general area. The History starts with Thomas of
Griffydam in the middle of the 17th century and yet there were
apparently Boultbees already established in Leicestershire for some
time. This puzzle has long concerned the Editors.
From the premise of the 1595 Robert Boltbye,
Appendix 1 advances the suggestion that a Boltby had fled to
Leicestershire from Yorkshire in the troublous times engendered by the
savage putting down of the religious uprisings known as the Pilgrimage
of Grace in the reign of Henry VIII. This Boltby, it is further
surmised, eventually had three sons -- one being the 1595 Robert (who
according to his Will had no sons), the second the grandfather of Thomas
of Griffydam, and a third son whose descendants retained the Boultby
spelling of the name which is still found today. (See page for late 17th
century Boultbys of London).
On this last paragraph we have some
comments. The early Boultbees of the History were undoubtedly
Protestants. In the years of the Pilgrimage of Grace England was still
officially a Catholic country. Though the Reformed faith had by then
begun to gain some ground. It is possible that a migrating father of
Robert, as a secret follower of the teachings of the new religion, was
escaping from a situation where dissent was equally dangerous for
rebelling Catholics or secret Protestants.
There is yet a further possibility that it
was, in fact, Robert who had migrated in the troublous times of the
persecution of Protestants in the reign of Mary I, when the North and
Yorkshire were still, generally, Catholic strongholds. If he died in
1595, he could have been born in Yorkshire around 1535 to 1540, and if
we project that onwards some 20 to 25 years he would have been a young
man at the time of his migrating to a safer place, a small village in
the depths of rural country, reasonably secure from Government searchers
after heretics, and Goadby Marwood would have fulfilled that necessity.
Leicestershire offering a haven could equally well apply if it was his
father who migrated. Why Leicestershire was chosen is a problem which
may never be solved -- perhaps it was by pure chance -- the fleeing
migrant may have just gone on and on ever further south until he found
somewhere he thought was safe enough. It seems unlikely, partly from the
distance involved, that Yorkshire Boultbees knew that they had distant
relations there.
Reverting to JB's memorandum and his
comments about Thomas of Griffydam's great-granddaughter, the Will of
Robert of Goadby Marwood in Appendix 1 refers to his daughter Margaret.
If we do accept that a brother of Robert was Thomas' grandfather then
Robert's daughter was Thomas' aunt, and this name was given to the
great-granddaughter, Margaret Fukes, for this reason, rather than her
being named after the Margaret of the Lastingham family as JB surmises.
There
still remains the puzzle of who exactly was the basket maker of the
History who, apparently rather suddenly, turns into a man of property.
Was he Thomas, originally of Lastingham, and now of Griffydam, who
realises his inheritance in Yorkshire from his father George in 1642, or
Thomas the grandson of Robert of Goadby Marwood's surmised brother, and
also now of Griffydam, who inherits from his father who had perhaps
continued to live in the Melton Mowbray area? The few inhabitants of
Griffydam may have been quite ignorant of those parts, or that Thomas
had relations there, and so the means on his part to acquire property
would have come as a surprise to them.
While
Appendix 2 has been concerned with alternative possibilities adding to
the early history of the family, they are still only reasonable
speculations. Chapters I and II of the History show that TPB himself was
not at all sure that the Thomas who married at Breedon Church in 1636
was indeed at the head of our family tree. The odds are that he probably
was, but only further research might be able to confirm this or not,
and to solve other intriguing problems which arise from it.
The
Editors continue research from various sources of information, but
there will come a time when they can no longer undertake it. Their
thoughts have turned to the long term when a member of the family,
perhaps not yet even born, will decide to pursue a particular aspect of
the family history, which had not been satisfactorily resolved up till
then. If and when such a situation comes about, we can say now that
details of such possible sources of information of which we are aware,
will have been recorded, and will be available from a designated family
member to anyone who feels they would like to do some research
themselves.
To end this Appendix, it is appropriate to
include another memorandum by JB dated January 1901, which was also
found among the loose papers in his copy. This, though it does not add
to the 1896 one in respect of family relationships is additionally
concerned with the family name and its various spellings at different
times. It also contains his most ingenious theory of how the early
mediaeval baronial family of de Bolteby's name originated. The
memorandum reads as follows:-
My belief with regard to the name of B. is
that Bolteby or Boltby is the proper name and is a place name --
Nicholas de Bolteby -- a Danish village. Nicholas de B. goes into
Northumberland, there are no male descendants after his son Adam de B.
but some of his collateral relatives no doubt followed the great man
further north and settled in Northumberland and Durham Co(unties).
Names soon got altered in those days -- phonetically spelt according as
pronounced by one or other who had not caught the correct way -- soon
altered to Boultby -- then the 't' left out, then Bowlby (Durham), and
Boulby (Yorks) -- then comes a revision to the phonetic Boultby with a
little more emphasis on the last syllable 'by' turned into 'bee' or
possibly Thos. B had traditionary recollections of the original
pronunciation of Bolteby, so we go on. Evidently Thomas, a smart chap
wherever he hailed from -- which accounts for the cuteness of the six or
so generations after him down to James Boultbee, son of Hugh, son of
James B. [JB. Ed.]
To have come over with William the Conqueror is an assumption of some families. It has been so assumed traditionally in respect of Sir Nicholas de Bolteby to whom Wm. gave the Manor of Ravensthorpe near Thirsk -- in which Manor is the village of Boltby. I was reading the other day concerning the French and German War, and among the places named was Boult-aux-Bois. The thought came -- if Nicholas B. came with the Conqueror, could he have hailed from that locality and so been called Nicholas de Boult-aux-Bois -- easily pronounced by Saxons Boulteby or other forms of phonetic pronunciation, and that the village of Boltby was named from him and not vice versa. There is not much in it I dare say but it's curious and might have happened -- the 'aux' becoming e and 'bois' becoming by or bee. |
We must give JB all due credit, at the age of 73, for being still alert to find something which he thought might add interest to any aspect of the Family History, and to record it.